Bwahaha... Blogger has word verification system now...
okie... I just read a very pissifying article on the New Paper today.
The headline screams "Health Club deadly HIV hubs?" and "Once inside, We Drop Our Towels".
In summary, The New Paper today reported that a gay man named 'Andy' contracted the HIV virus in a gay bathhouse after a romp with four men.
Okay. What on earth would cause a person to humiliate himself so publicly like that? Is it pure suicide?
The answer, he contracted AIDS.
I mean, what the hell.
"'Andy' was quoted as saying, "I feel that the Government should step in and do something. Closing the clubs may not stop the spread of Aids. But it will definitely help to slow it down. If the government can ban nation and other gay parties because it thinks that they promote gay sex, how can it turn a blind eye to these men’s clubs? The parties are held only once a year, but these clubs are open every day."
the point that I'm angry about is not his insistency at his government closing these places, IF what he says is true. (But most likely, his statement is clouded by his anger at being a victim of a death sentence.)
BUT. What I am very erked about is his cowardly pushing of blames to the these clubs, parties and even the Government.
If he didn't wear protection, its his own darn business. Its sick.
Here the AFA (Action for AIDS) is promoting the use of safe sex practices, and there dumb assholes like him are going around flaming the public with the opinion that homosexuality constitute AIDS.
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.
Its a death sentence to all who gets it. But before one gets it, imagine the likelihood of the person having unprotected sex?
well, there are cases of blood contact and rape, most of it is just based on pure irresponsibility.
In the article, Andy blamed the government for not closing down these places, thus deeming them being irresponsible by promoting the cause of AIDS.
However, he just admitted that he had unprotected sex.
He is like asking for it!
Dumb retard.
and the New Paper is no better for allowing such articles to be published.
damm bias straights.
The PAP (which incidentally is anti-homosexual [Re: there is evidence in interviews during the elections. so i'm not saying something defamatory]) has already supported the decision to ban AJ parties such as Nation and the Mardi Gras, and now this person is trying to instigate them to ban another place where AJs can socialize?
well.
If that aint so. Go ahead and close Happy, WhyNot, Taboo, Mad Monks, 3 Cows and what have you.
why NOT? after all, they have already closed down places like Waterbar and Centro
(waterbar claimed that it was because of allowing underage teens to enter. However, if this was true, why do clubs like SPARKS still stand? - fishy)
(Centro claimed that they were unable to pay the rental fee 1 Fullerton. If they can hire world famous DJs to do their remixes, they aren't able to pay a meagre rental fee? - fishy)
while lesbians can kiss and hug and do whatever they want in public, two guys holding hand are still outlawed. wtf?
From liberal United States (Rio de Janario) to Conservative China (Hong Kong), AJ factions are able to have rallies under the rainbow flag, with the green light from the government. However in Singapore, the PLU (people like us), are unable to get any social activities, be it big or small approved by the government.
The AFA, PLU and other AIDS awareness groups has already done an excellent job in informing every single AJs about the dangers of AIDS, the vulnarability of the human system and the need to use protection every single time.
I even get free condoms from Fridae.com. wth?
You only need idiots like Mr. Andy to complain to the media about these stuffs, and undecerning papers who only care for sensationalizing stuffs will lap it up like desert rain.
so, dumb clucks like Mr. Andy out there not only ruined his life permernantly, but destroyed his own reputation utterly.
He wont even be able to crawl under his feet and hide his face from the public.
He repulses me.
Full stop.
p.s. if the New Paper sees this, they are most likely going to put it up on their paper too, under headline "Pro-Gay activists attacks PAP's policies and Media".
whatever.
No comments:
Post a Comment